In order for a student to find something meaningful, they need to have an interest in it. If they find an incentive meaningful, it is because the incentive is something they want or like. If a student finds a consequence meaningful, it is because it will affect negatively them in some way. If they don’t care about a determined set of incentives or consequences, and they do not possess internal motivation, then it is likely that any challenging behavior they have will most likely continue.
With motivational deficits, one way to guide the student in the right direction is with incentives. These incentives can be physical or as simple as a nice compliment. The rewards need to be agreed upon between the students and the teacher. Having this open communication deems the incentives meaningful and gives the student a sense of buy-in. It is important to remember the balance when implementing an incentive program in your classroom. As the children get better at using their appropriate social, emotional, and behavioral skills throughout the year, the rewards should become harder to obtain. “This allows students to grow and mature and to not have to receive a reward every time they do a positive behavior. This personal growth allows you to develop different incentives that continue you to challenge students” (Hamlett, 2018, p. 1). On the flip side, if a student is still not responding, even after meaningful incentives have been put in place, then consequences should occur. These consequences need to affect the student. For example, sending a student to another room to read instead of participating in Friday Free Time games will not be a good consequence if the student loves to read. This is why it is crucial to really get to know your students and their interests. By removing something form the day that the child loves, or could be used as an incentive to get back to the good behavior, is the key to a successful consequence plan.
When approaching the development of a behavior intervention plan (BIP), certain issues may arise which need to be factored in to the finalized plan. For example, if you are consistently reinforcing the appropriate behavior of a student, and at the same time, a peer group is reinforcing the negative behavior of a student, then an intervention on the part of the group needs to be made. The group should be taught the appropriate responses to the peer who is in need of the targeted intervention. If the groups behavior can be easily directed toward reinforcing the positive behaviors of the target student, then the problem will be on its way to being solved, or at least better. This task can be accomplished through role play. A scenario can be created in a script where the class acts out a similar situation to the current problem in class. This way, everyone can learn how to reinforce positive behaviors as opposed to negative ones. As Hamlett (2018) stated, “Using peers in a behavior intervention plan can be a successful way to help a student master a targeted behavior” (p. 1). By having the right balance of teacher and peers reinforcing positive behaviors, the classroom can function as a whole community, working together, to help the target student.
References
Hamlett, T. (2018). Module 4: Incentives, peers, and the educative time-out process, Part 1 transcript: Incentives [Lecture notes]. Retrieved from https://ace.instructure.com/courses/1652445/files/100071763?module_item_id=22985953&fd_cookie_set=1
Hamlett, T. (2018). Module 4: Incentives, peers, and the educative time-out process, Part 2 transcript: Peer Support [Lecture notes]. Retrieved from https://ace.instructure.com/courses/1652445/files/100071763?module_item_id=22985953&fd_cookie_set=1